Setbacks, Humiliation and Lesson Learning
Posted: Sat Nov 08, 2014 8:44 pm
Setbacks, Humiliation and Lesson Learning
The last 46 years of Mauritian politics are full of rich, diverse and colourful events, dramas, unexpected turns and an array of competing political parties. There have been highs and lows, major political leaders and parties have all had their share of setbacks, humiliation and lessons to learn. This coming election will be no different, the only unknown is which leader and party will face setbacks, humiliation and in need of lesson learning this time?
This coming election has a central, dominant issue at stake that is both controversial and divisive among voters, that of ‘constitutional reform’ as proposed by the PTr/MMM alliance. In that light, it might be instructive to consider two parallel election cases.
First on the local scene, we all know that the elections of August 1967 were of supreme importance precisely because at stake was the central issue of independence of the country, a controversial and divisive issue at the time. Clearly, there were two main parties/alliances before the people; the choice was crystal clear - voting for one meant independence for the country and voting for the other meant no independence as proposed. We all know the results and the changes it meant for the country and for its people. The 1967 election was essentially a referendum election. Our next election has also been described by many as such in relation to the constitutional reform proposal.
http://www.lexpress.mu/idee/254696/setb ... n-learning
The last 46 years of Mauritian politics are full of rich, diverse and colourful events, dramas, unexpected turns and an array of competing political parties. There have been highs and lows, major political leaders and parties have all had their share of setbacks, humiliation and lessons to learn. This coming election will be no different, the only unknown is which leader and party will face setbacks, humiliation and in need of lesson learning this time?
This coming election has a central, dominant issue at stake that is both controversial and divisive among voters, that of ‘constitutional reform’ as proposed by the PTr/MMM alliance. In that light, it might be instructive to consider two parallel election cases.
First on the local scene, we all know that the elections of August 1967 were of supreme importance precisely because at stake was the central issue of independence of the country, a controversial and divisive issue at the time. Clearly, there were two main parties/alliances before the people; the choice was crystal clear - voting for one meant independence for the country and voting for the other meant no independence as proposed. We all know the results and the changes it meant for the country and for its people. The 1967 election was essentially a referendum election. Our next election has also been described by many as such in relation to the constitutional reform proposal.
http://www.lexpress.mu/idee/254696/setb ... n-learning